Evaluating uncertainty of surface measurement system by laser scan micrometer method
Email:
cuc.nguyenthikim@hust.edu.vn
Keywords:
3D measurement, measurement uncertainty, cylinder deviation, reverse solution
Abstract
The use of three-dimensional (3D) data in the field of industrial metrology has become increasingly popular due to the rapid development of laser scanning techniques. However, the accuracy and uncertainty of these types of measurement methods are rarely investigated. In this study, an uncertainty evaluation and presentation model for the measurement of cylindrical deviations of standard cylindrical parts was proposed using the Laser Scan Micrometer (LSM) measuring system. Experiments were performed using the inverse method to measure the cylindricity in the laboratory with two component deviations in the cross section and in the axial section. Experimental results of the cylinder deviation measurement by laser scanning method to measure the profile of the standard cylindrical parts with the uncertainty of measuring the profile cross section of 1.68 m and the axial section of 6 m with a reliable probability 95%References
[1]. K. Endo, W. Gao, S. Kiyono, A new multi-probe arrangement for surface profile measurement of cylinders, JSME International Journal, Series C: Mechanical Systems, Machine Elements and Manufacturing, 46 (2003) 1531–1537. https://doi.org/10.1299/jsmec.46.1531
[2]. C. Sun, H. Wang, Y. Liu, X. Wang, B. Wang, C. Li, J. Tan, A cylindrical profile measurement method for cylindricity and coaxiality of stepped shaft, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 111 (2020) 2845-2856. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06296-5
[3]. Q. Li, Y. Shimizu, T. Saito, H. Matsukuma, W. Gao, Measurement Uncertainty Analysis of a Stitching Linear-Scan Method for the Evaluation of Roundness of Small Cylinders, Applied Sciences, 10 (2020) 4750. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10144750
[4]. G. Gayton, R. Su, R. Leach, L.Bradley, Uncertainty evaluation of fringe projection based on the linear systems theory, Conference: 35th Annual Coordinate Metrology Soc, Orlando, USA, 2019.
[5]. J. Lee, Y. Noh, Y. Arai, W. Gao, C. Park, Precision measurement of cylinder surface profile on an ultra-precision machine tool, Measurement Science Review, 9 (2009) 49–52. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10048-009-0008-4
[6]. A. Costanzo, M. Minasi, G. Casula, M. Musacchio, M. F. Buongiorno, Combined use of terrestrial laser scanning and IR Thermography applied to a historical building, Sensors, 15 (2014) 194–213. https://doi.org/10.3390/s150100194
[7]. N. Senin, S. Catalucci, M. Moretti, R. K. Leach, Statistical Point Cloud Model to Investigate Measurement Uncertainty in Coordinate Metrology, Precision Engineering, 70 (2021) 44–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2021.01.008
[8]. Z. Du, Z. Wu, J. Yang, Error ellipsoid analysis for the diameter measurement of cylindroid components using a laser radar measurement system, Sensors, 16 (2016) 714. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16050714
[9]. S. Mekid, K. Vacharanukul, In-process out-of-roundness measurement probe for turned workpieces, Measurement, 44 (2011) 762–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2011.01.011
[10]. M. Zhang, Y. Liu, C. Sun, X. Wang, J. Tan, A systematic error modeling and separation method for the special cylindrical profile measurement based on 2-dimension laser displacement sensor, Review of Scientific Instruments, 90 (2019) 105006. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5111350
[11]. G. L. Leonard Schild, A. Kraemer, D. Reiling, H. Wu, Influence of surface roughness on measurement uncertainty in Computed Tomography, 8th Conference on Industrial Computed Tomography, 2018, Wels Australia (iCT), 6-9. http://www.ndt.net/?id=21910
[12]. M. Ren, C. Cheung, L. Kong, S. Wang, Quantitative analysis of the measurement uncertainty in form characterization of freeform surfaces based on Monte Carlo simulation, Procedia CIRP, 27 (2015) 276–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.04.078
[13]. ITTC, “ITTC – Recommended Procedures and Guidelines ITTC Quality System Manual Recommended Procedures and Guidelines Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Experimental Hy- drodynamics ITTC – Recommended Procedures and Guidelines, 2014. https://www.ittc.info/ truy cập ngày 15 tháng 8 năm 2021
[14]. Tiêu chuẩn Việt nam, TCVN9595-3:2013-Độ không đảm bảo đo- Phần 3: Hướng dẫn trình bày độ không đảm bảo đo (GUM:1995), https://tieuchuan.vsqi.gov.vn/tieuchuan/view?sohieu=TCVN%209595-3:2013, truy cập ngày 15 tháng 8 năm 2021.
[15]. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, Evaluation of measurement data — Supplement 1 to the Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, Propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method, JCGM 101 (2008) 90. https://www.iso.org/sites/JCGM/GUM-introduction/, truy cập ngày 15 tháng 8 năm 2021.
[2]. C. Sun, H. Wang, Y. Liu, X. Wang, B. Wang, C. Li, J. Tan, A cylindrical profile measurement method for cylindricity and coaxiality of stepped shaft, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 111 (2020) 2845-2856. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06296-5
[3]. Q. Li, Y. Shimizu, T. Saito, H. Matsukuma, W. Gao, Measurement Uncertainty Analysis of a Stitching Linear-Scan Method for the Evaluation of Roundness of Small Cylinders, Applied Sciences, 10 (2020) 4750. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10144750
[4]. G. Gayton, R. Su, R. Leach, L.Bradley, Uncertainty evaluation of fringe projection based on the linear systems theory, Conference: 35th Annual Coordinate Metrology Soc, Orlando, USA, 2019.
[5]. J. Lee, Y. Noh, Y. Arai, W. Gao, C. Park, Precision measurement of cylinder surface profile on an ultra-precision machine tool, Measurement Science Review, 9 (2009) 49–52. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10048-009-0008-4
[6]. A. Costanzo, M. Minasi, G. Casula, M. Musacchio, M. F. Buongiorno, Combined use of terrestrial laser scanning and IR Thermography applied to a historical building, Sensors, 15 (2014) 194–213. https://doi.org/10.3390/s150100194
[7]. N. Senin, S. Catalucci, M. Moretti, R. K. Leach, Statistical Point Cloud Model to Investigate Measurement Uncertainty in Coordinate Metrology, Precision Engineering, 70 (2021) 44–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2021.01.008
[8]. Z. Du, Z. Wu, J. Yang, Error ellipsoid analysis for the diameter measurement of cylindroid components using a laser radar measurement system, Sensors, 16 (2016) 714. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16050714
[9]. S. Mekid, K. Vacharanukul, In-process out-of-roundness measurement probe for turned workpieces, Measurement, 44 (2011) 762–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2011.01.011
[10]. M. Zhang, Y. Liu, C. Sun, X. Wang, J. Tan, A systematic error modeling and separation method for the special cylindrical profile measurement based on 2-dimension laser displacement sensor, Review of Scientific Instruments, 90 (2019) 105006. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5111350
[11]. G. L. Leonard Schild, A. Kraemer, D. Reiling, H. Wu, Influence of surface roughness on measurement uncertainty in Computed Tomography, 8th Conference on Industrial Computed Tomography, 2018, Wels Australia (iCT), 6-9. http://www.ndt.net/?id=21910
[12]. M. Ren, C. Cheung, L. Kong, S. Wang, Quantitative analysis of the measurement uncertainty in form characterization of freeform surfaces based on Monte Carlo simulation, Procedia CIRP, 27 (2015) 276–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.04.078
[13]. ITTC, “ITTC – Recommended Procedures and Guidelines ITTC Quality System Manual Recommended Procedures and Guidelines Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Experimental Hy- drodynamics ITTC – Recommended Procedures and Guidelines, 2014. https://www.ittc.info/ truy cập ngày 15 tháng 8 năm 2021
[14]. Tiêu chuẩn Việt nam, TCVN9595-3:2013-Độ không đảm bảo đo- Phần 3: Hướng dẫn trình bày độ không đảm bảo đo (GUM:1995), https://tieuchuan.vsqi.gov.vn/tieuchuan/view?sohieu=TCVN%209595-3:2013, truy cập ngày 15 tháng 8 năm 2021.
[15]. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, Evaluation of measurement data — Supplement 1 to the Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, Propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method, JCGM 101 (2008) 90. https://www.iso.org/sites/JCGM/GUM-introduction/, truy cập ngày 15 tháng 8 năm 2021.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Received
24/07/2021
Revised
03/10/2021
Accepted
14/10/2021
Published
15/12/2021
Type
Research Article
How to Cite
Lê Xuân, C., Nguyễn Văn, V., Hoàng Hồng, H., & Nguyễn Thị Kim, C. (1200). Evaluating uncertainty of surface measurement system by laser scan micrometer method. Transport and Communications Science Journal, 72(9), 1107-1117. https://doi.org/10.47869/tcsj.72.9.9
Abstract Views
310
Total Galley Views
718
