Measuring the success level of public-private partnership transportation infrastructure projects in vietnam using fuzzy topsis method

  • Le Dinh Thuc

    Pukyong National University, 45 Yongso-ro, Namgu, Busan, South Korea
  • Pham Phu Cuong

    Campus in Ho Chi Minh City, University of Transport and Communications, 450 - 451 Le Van Viet Street, Tang Nhon Phu A Ward, District 9, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Email: ppcuong@utc2.edu.vn
Từ khóa: Public-private partnership, transportation projects, success level, fuzzy TOPSIS, Vietnam.

Tóm tắt

Public–Private Partnership (PPP) has emerged as an effective procurement in delivering infrastructure and public service in many countries over the world since last few decades. It brought more benefits for sustainable development compared to traditional procurement in many developing countries. However, in order to determine whether a project is successful or not has still remained an ambiguous perception. Therefore, this study will rank the successful level for PPP transportation infrastructure projects in Vietnam via case studies. Fifteen success criteria were identified by the comprehensive review. The fuzzy TOPSIS method was then applied to evaluate and rank the success level for case studies. The result showed that project 2 is considered as the most successful until this recent time with a satisfactory degree of 0.489. Project 1 and project 3 are ranked second and third with a satisfactory degree of 0.482 and 0.435, respectively. Although the projects were judged as effective. Nevertheless, the success index of these expressway project still lower than 0.5. Therefore, project managers need to propose effective solutions to improve the success of these projects in the future. This result can help participants to be a good insight into the PPP project success in developing countries in general and Vietnam in particular.

Tài liệu tham khảo

[1]. A. Akintoye, C. Hardcastle, M. Beck, E. Chinyio, D. Asenova, Achieving best value in private finance initiative project procurement, Construction Management and Economics, 21 (2003) 461 – 470. http://doi.org/10.1080/0144619032000087285
[2]. E. Skietrys, A. Raipa, E.V. Bartkus, Dimensions of the efficiency of the public – private partnership, Engineering Economics, 58 (2008) 3 – 45. http://inzeko.ktu.lt/index.php/EE/article/view/11542
[3]. R. Osei – Kyei, A.P.C. Chan, Review of studies on the Critical Success Factors for Public – Private Partnership (PPP) projects from 1990 to 2013, International Journal of Project Management, 33 (2015) 1335 – 1346. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.02.008
[4]. T.D. Sy, V. Likhitruangsilp, M. Onishi, T.P. Nguyen, Impacts of risk factors on the performance of Public-Private Partnership transportation projects in Vietnam, ASEAN Eng. J., 7 (2017) 30-52.
[5]. S.O. Ogunlana, Build operate transfer procurement traps: examples from transportation projects in Thailand, Paper presented in Proceedings of CIB W92 on Procurement, IF Research Corporation, Montreal, 1997.
[6]. A. Davies, M. Moore, No way out of tunnel torture, Sydney Morning Herald, 21 October 2005.
[7]. J.J.A.M. Reijniers, Organization of Public – Private Partnership projects: the timely prevention of pitfalls, International Journal of Project Management, 12 (1994) 137 – 142. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(94)90028-0
[8]. Y. Ke, S.Q. Wang, A.P.C. Chan, E. Cheung, Research trend of Public – Private Partnership in Construction Journals, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135 (2009) 1076 – 1086. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2009)135:10(1076)
[9]. U. Ahamd, Y.B. Ibrahim, A.B.A. Bakar, Malaysian Public Private Partnership projects: Project success definition, International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7 (2018) 33-37. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.30.18151
[10]. A. Hodge, C. Greve, Public Private Partnership: An internatinal performance review. Public Administration Review, 67 (2007) 545-558. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00736.x
[11]. R. Osei-Kyei, A.P.C. Chan, Comparative analysis of the success criteria for Public – Private Partnership projects in Ghana and Hong Kong, Project Management Journal, 48 (2017) 80-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697281704800407
[12]. L.A. Ika, Project success as a topic in project management journal, Project Management Journal, 40 (2009) 6-19. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20137
[13]. A.P.C. Chan, A.P.L. Chan, Key performance indicators for measuring construction success, Benchmarking: An International Journal, 11 (2004) 203 – 221. https://doi.org/10.1108/14635770410532624
[14]. S.M.H.M. Al-Tmeemy, H.A. Rahman, Z. Harun, Future criteria for success of building projects in Malaysia. International Journal of Project Management, 29 (2011), 337 – 348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.03.003
[15]. A.P.C. Chan, D. Scott, E.W.M. Lam, Framework of success criteria for design/build projects, Journal of Management in Engineering, 18 (2002) 120 – 128. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2002)18:3(120)
[16]. A.M.M. Liu, A. Walker, Evaluation of project outcomes, Construction Management and Economics, 16 (1998) 209 – 219. https://doi.org/10.1080/014461998372493
[17]. S. Zhang, A.P.C. Chan, Y. Feng, H. Duan, Y. Ke, Crirical review on PPP Research – A search from the Chinese and International Journals, International Journal of Project Management, 34 (2016) 597 – 612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.02.008
[18]. C.M. Tam, Build – Operate – Transfer model for infrastructure developments in Asia: reasons for success and failures, International Journal of Project Management, 17 (1999) 377 – 382. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00061-1
[19]. J. Yuan, A.Y. Zeng, M.J. Skibniewski, Q. Li, Selection of performance objectives and key performance indicators in public – private partnership projects to achieve value for money, Construction Management and Economics, 27 (2009) 253 – 270. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190902748705
[20]. G. Mladenovic, N. Vajdic, B. Wundsch, A. Temeljotov-Salaj, Use of key performance indicators for PPP transport projects to meet stakeholders’ performance objectives, Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 3 (2013) 228 – 249. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-05-2012-0026
[21]. F. Villalba-Romero, C. Liyanage, Evaluating success in PPP road projects in Europe: a comparison of performance measurement approachs, Transportation Research Procedia, 14 (2016) 372 – 381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.089
[22]. C. Liyanage, F. Villalba-Romero, Measuring success of PPP transport projects: A cross-case analysis of toll roads, Transport Review, 35 (2015) 140 – 161. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2014.994583
[23]. M. Zayyanu, F. Johar, Measuring the success of Public – Private Partnership projects: a conceptual framework. Journal of Built Environment, Technology and Engineering, 2 (2017) 90 – 98. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.10038
[24]. C.S. Lim, M.Z. Mohamed, Criteria of project success: an exploratory re-examination. International Journal of Project Management, 17 (1999) 243 – 248. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00040-4
[25]. D.K. Ahadzie, D.G. Proverbs, P.O. Olomolaiye, Critical success criteria for mass house building projects in developing countries, International Journal of Project Management, 26 (2008) 675 – 687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.09.006
[26]. D. Baccarini, The logical framework method for defining project success, Project Management Journal, 30 (1999) 25 – 32. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697289903000405
[27]. J. Liu, P.E.D. Love, M.C.P. Sing, J. Smith, J. Matthews, PPP Social Infrastructure Procurement: Examining the Feasibility of a Lifecycle Performance Measurement Framework, Journal of Infrastructure System, 23 (2017) 04016041. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000347
[28]. R. Kangari, L.S. Riggs, Construction risk assessment by linguistic, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 36 (1989) 126 – 131. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.18829
[29]. S. Nădăban, S. Dzitac, I. Dzitac, Fuzzy TOPSIS: A general review, Procedia Computer Science, 91 (2016) 823 – 831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.07.088
[30]. R.E. Bellman, L.A. Zadeh, Decision-making in a fuzzy environment, Management Science, 17 (1970) 141 – 164. https://doi.odg/10.1287/mnsc.17.4.B141
[31]. A.V. Thomas, S.N. Kalidindi, L.S. , Ganesh, Modelling and assessment of critical risks in BOT road projects, Construction Management and Economics, 24 (2006) 407 – 424. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190500435275.
[32]. Y. Xu, J.F.Y. Yeung, A.P.C. Chan, D.W.M. Chan, S.Q. Wang, Y. Ke, Developing a risk assessment model for PPP in China – A fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach, Autom. Constr., 19 (2010) 929 – 943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.06.006.
[33]. M.S.Islam, M. P. Nepal, M. Skitmore, M. Attarzadeh, Current research trend and application areas of fuzzy and hybrid methods to risk assessment of construction projects, Advanced Engineering Infomatics, 33 (2017) 112-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2017.06.001
[34]. A.I. Maghsoodi, M. Khalilzadeh, Identification and evaluation of construction projects critical success factors employing fuzzy-TOPSIS approach, KSCE Journal of Cilvil Engineering, 22 (2018) 1593 – 1605. https://doi.org/10/1007/s12205-017-1970-2
[35]. Y.T. Tan, L.Y. Shen, C. Langston, Y. Liu, Construction project selection using fuzzy TOPSIS approach, Journal of Modelling in Management, 5 (2010) 302 – 315, https://doi.org/10.1108/17465661011092669
[36]. A.R.K. Azari, N. Mousavi, S.F. Mousavi, S.B. Hosseini, Risk assessment model selection in construction industry, Expert System with Applications, 38 (2011) 9105 – 9111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.110
[37]. Zimmermann, H.J., Fuzzy Set Theory and its application, 4th ed., Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA, 2001.
[38]. S. Heilpern, Representation and application of fuzzy numbers, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 91 (1997) 259- 268, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00146-2
[39]. A. Awasthi, S.S. Chauhan, S.K. Goyal, A multi-criteria decision making approach for location planning for urban distribution centers under uncertainty, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 53 (2011) 98 – 109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2017.07.023
[40]. C.T. Chen, Extension of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114 (2000) 1 – 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00377-1

Tải xuống

Chưa có dữ liệu thống kê
Nhận bài
26/03/2020
Nhận bài sửa
17/05/2020
Chấp nhận đăng
18/05/2020
Xuất bản
28/05/2020
Chuyên mục
Công trình khoa học