How cost savings and other factors shape public transport choices in Hanoi: A circular economy perspective
Email:
dungntt89@utc.edu.vn
Từ khóa:
Kinh tế tuần hoàn,, Phương tiện công cộng, Tiết kiệm chi phí, Xếp hạng thứ bậc, Giao thông Hà nội
Tóm tắt
Public transport is essential for urban mobility, yet differences in cost efficiency and service accessibility create challenges across city zones. This study examines how these factors influence public transport choices in Hanoi, considering variations across different urban areas. The analysis is based on seven key criteria: cost savings, time efficiency, convenience, safety, accessibility, reliability, and environmental awareness, providing a comprehensive understanding of regional transport preferences and economic implications. Findings indicate significant regional variations in cost savings. In urban cores, savings are limited (0%–50%) due to short travel distances and private vehicle convenience. In expanding areas, savings rise (25%–75%) as public transport becomes a cost-effective alternative for longer commutes. In peripheral and rural areas, over 50% of residents benefit from high savings, given their reliance on long-distance buses. AHP results highlight distinct priorities. Cost is the primary factor in rural areas, while accessibility drives urban core decisions due to dense transport networks. In expanding zones, time efficiency is the top concern, making metro systems the preferred choice. Notably, environmental awareness ranks lowest across all regions. The study recommends strategies aligned with circular economy principles, focusing on system optimization rather than infrastructure expansion. Solutions include smart traffic management, multimodal integration, and sustainable maintenance, offering actionable insights for Hanoi’s public transport developmentTài liệu tham khảo
[1]. K. van Goeverden, P. Peeters, Financially independent public transport; its impacts on the public transport system in the Netherlands, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 5 (2005) 97-114.
[2]. M. Ahmad, I. Anwer, M. I. Yousuf, M. A. Javid, N. Ali, G. Tesoriere, T. Campisi, Investigating the Key Factors Affecting Public Transport Ridership in Developing Countries through Structural Equation Modeling, Sustainability, 16 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114426
[3]. D. Wang, Y. Liu, Factors Influencing Public Transport Use: A Study of University Commuters’ Travel and Mode Choice Behaviours, in State of Australian Cities National Conference, Gold Coast, Australia, 2015.
[4]. M. Sommer, J. Dargay, D. Gately, Vehicle Ownership and Income Growth, Worldwide: 1960-2030, The Energy Journal, 28 (2007) 143-170.
[5]. P. Newman, J. Kenworthy, The End of Automobile Dependence: How Cities Are Moving Beyond Car-Based Planning, Washington, DC: Island Press, 2015.
[6]. H. Hu, J. Xu, Q. Shen, F. Shi, Y. Chen, Travel mode choices in small cities of China: A case study of Changting, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 59 (2018) 361-374.
[7]. B. P. Y. Loo, C. Chen, E. T. H. Chan, Rail-based transit-oriented development: Lessons from New York City and Hong Kong, Landscape and Urban Planning, 97 (2010) 202-212.
[8]. R. Cervero, J. Murakami, Effects of Built Environments on Vehicle Miles Traveled: Evidence from 370 US Urbanized Areas, Environment and Planning A, 42 (2010) 400-418. https://doi.org/10.1068/a4236
[9]. N. Paulley, R. Balcombe, R. Mackett, H. Titheridge, J. Preston, M. Wardman, J. Shires, P. White, The demand for public transport: The effects of fares, quality of service, income and car ownership, Transport Policy, 13 (2006) 295-306.
[10]. L. Redman, M. Friman, T. Gärling, T. Hartig, Quality attributes of public transport that attract car users: A research review, Transport Policy, 25 (2013) 119-127.
[11]. G. Currie, A. Delbosc, Understanding bus rapid transit route ridership drivers: An empirical study of Australian BRT systems, Transport Policy, 18 (2011) 755-764.
[12]. V. Balali, B. Zahraie, A. Roozbahani, Integration of ELECTRE III and PROMETHEE II Decision-Making Methods with an Interval Approach: Application in Selection of Appropriate Structural Systems, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 28 (2014) 297-314.
[13]. H. Taherdoost, Using PROMETHEE Method for Multi-Criteria Decision Making: Applications and Procedures, Iris Journal of Economics & Business Management, 1 (2023).
[14]. U. Hasan, A. Whyte, H. AlJassmi, A multi-criteria decision-making framework for sustainable road transport systems: Integrating stakeholder-cost-environment-energy for a highway case study in United Arab Emirates, Journal of Cleaner Production, 450 (2024) 141831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141831
[15]. A. Ishizaka, A. Labib, Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process, Expert Systems with Applications, 38 (2011) 14336-14345.
[16]. D. Banister, K. Button, Transport, the Environment and Sustainable Development: E & FN Spon, 1993.
[17]. F. Ellen MacArthur, The Circular Economy in Cities: Resources Suite, 2021.
[18]. T. International Association of Public, Global Urban Mobility Indicators 2022, UITP, 2022.
[19]. F. International Transport, ITF Transport Outlook 2021, Paris: OECD Publishing, 2021.
[20]. K. Fujimoto, Battery collection and recycling in Japan, Industrial Chemistry Library, G. Pistoia, J. P. Wiaux and S. P. Wolsky, eds., (2001) 87-104: Elsevier.
[21]. J. S. G. Collazos, L. M. C. Ardila, C. J. F. Cardona, Energy transition in sustainable transport: concepts, policies, and methodologies, Environmental Sciences and Pollution Research, 31 (2024) 58669-58686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-34862-x
[2]. M. Ahmad, I. Anwer, M. I. Yousuf, M. A. Javid, N. Ali, G. Tesoriere, T. Campisi, Investigating the Key Factors Affecting Public Transport Ridership in Developing Countries through Structural Equation Modeling, Sustainability, 16 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114426
[3]. D. Wang, Y. Liu, Factors Influencing Public Transport Use: A Study of University Commuters’ Travel and Mode Choice Behaviours, in State of Australian Cities National Conference, Gold Coast, Australia, 2015.
[4]. M. Sommer, J. Dargay, D. Gately, Vehicle Ownership and Income Growth, Worldwide: 1960-2030, The Energy Journal, 28 (2007) 143-170.
[5]. P. Newman, J. Kenworthy, The End of Automobile Dependence: How Cities Are Moving Beyond Car-Based Planning, Washington, DC: Island Press, 2015.
[6]. H. Hu, J. Xu, Q. Shen, F. Shi, Y. Chen, Travel mode choices in small cities of China: A case study of Changting, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 59 (2018) 361-374.
[7]. B. P. Y. Loo, C. Chen, E. T. H. Chan, Rail-based transit-oriented development: Lessons from New York City and Hong Kong, Landscape and Urban Planning, 97 (2010) 202-212.
[8]. R. Cervero, J. Murakami, Effects of Built Environments on Vehicle Miles Traveled: Evidence from 370 US Urbanized Areas, Environment and Planning A, 42 (2010) 400-418. https://doi.org/10.1068/a4236
[9]. N. Paulley, R. Balcombe, R. Mackett, H. Titheridge, J. Preston, M. Wardman, J. Shires, P. White, The demand for public transport: The effects of fares, quality of service, income and car ownership, Transport Policy, 13 (2006) 295-306.
[10]. L. Redman, M. Friman, T. Gärling, T. Hartig, Quality attributes of public transport that attract car users: A research review, Transport Policy, 25 (2013) 119-127.
[11]. G. Currie, A. Delbosc, Understanding bus rapid transit route ridership drivers: An empirical study of Australian BRT systems, Transport Policy, 18 (2011) 755-764.
[12]. V. Balali, B. Zahraie, A. Roozbahani, Integration of ELECTRE III and PROMETHEE II Decision-Making Methods with an Interval Approach: Application in Selection of Appropriate Structural Systems, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 28 (2014) 297-314.
[13]. H. Taherdoost, Using PROMETHEE Method for Multi-Criteria Decision Making: Applications and Procedures, Iris Journal of Economics & Business Management, 1 (2023).
[14]. U. Hasan, A. Whyte, H. AlJassmi, A multi-criteria decision-making framework for sustainable road transport systems: Integrating stakeholder-cost-environment-energy for a highway case study in United Arab Emirates, Journal of Cleaner Production, 450 (2024) 141831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141831
[15]. A. Ishizaka, A. Labib, Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process, Expert Systems with Applications, 38 (2011) 14336-14345.
[16]. D. Banister, K. Button, Transport, the Environment and Sustainable Development: E & FN Spon, 1993.
[17]. F. Ellen MacArthur, The Circular Economy in Cities: Resources Suite, 2021.
[18]. T. International Association of Public, Global Urban Mobility Indicators 2022, UITP, 2022.
[19]. F. International Transport, ITF Transport Outlook 2021, Paris: OECD Publishing, 2021.
[20]. K. Fujimoto, Battery collection and recycling in Japan, Industrial Chemistry Library, G. Pistoia, J. P. Wiaux and S. P. Wolsky, eds., (2001) 87-104: Elsevier.
[21]. J. S. G. Collazos, L. M. C. Ardila, C. J. F. Cardona, Energy transition in sustainable transport: concepts, policies, and methodologies, Environmental Sciences and Pollution Research, 31 (2024) 58669-58686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-34862-x
Tải xuống
Chưa có dữ liệu thống kê
Nhận bài
02/04/2025
Nhận bài sửa
06/05/2025
Chấp nhận đăng
10/05/2025
Xuất bản
15/05/2025
Chuyên mục
Công trình khoa học
Kiểu trích dẫn
Phan Nguyen Hoai, N., & Nguyen Thi Thuy, D. (1747242000). How cost savings and other factors shape public transport choices in Hanoi: A circular economy perspective . Tạp Chí Khoa Học Giao Thông Vận Tải, 76(4), 447-460. https://doi.org/10.47869/tcsj.76.4.1
Số lần xem tóm tắt
93
Số lần xem bài báo
36
