The determination of indicators for the safety assessment of modern train control signal system
Email:
ndviet@utc.edu.vn
Keywords:
Modern signal system, train safety, safety indicators, danger, quantification
Abstract
The task of safety assessment of a train control signal system is an indispensable task for any railway transport system. The emergence of a train control signal system with today's modern technology based on computers and computer networks will require a new safety assessment method. The train control signal system is analyzed from the need, function, structure, technology background to give the most general model of the system. Analysis of possible errors of the train control signal system leads to dangerous unstable and unstable events to provide a safety assessment model, thereby forming a full range of concepts, safety indicators and risks for the system. The full determination of safety and risk indicators for a modern train control signal system will be the basis for further studies, finding quantitative methods for each indicator, serving service of evaluation, operation management, design for train control signal system with solutions to ensure train safetyReferences
[1]. V. M. Lisenkov, Statistical theory of train safety, Russian Institute for Scientific and Technical Information (VINITI RAS), Moscow, 1999.
[2]. EN50126-2; Railway Applications—Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety Specifications and Demonstrations (RAMS) Part 2: A systems approach to safety. Center for European Standards Management (CEN-CENELEC): Brussels, Belgium, 2017.
[3]. A. Boussif, A.Tonk, J. Beugin, S. C. Dutilleu, Operational risk assessment of railway remote driving system, Safety and Reliability, (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/09617353.2023.2226965
[4]. Nguyễn Duy Việt, Phân tích an toàn hệ thống đóng đường tự động đường đôi dòng một chiều trên cơ sở phân tích chức năng để xác định nguyên nhân dẫn tới trạng thái nguy hiểm, Tạp chí Khoa học và Công nghệ Giao thông Vận tải, 56 (2017) 52-58.
[5]. Nguyễn Duy Việt, Xây dựng phần tử logic “AND” an toàn với tín hiệu kiểm tra chuyên dụng sử dụng trong hệ thống điều khiển chạy tàu, Tạp chí Khoa học và Công nghệ Giao thông Vận tải, 64 (2018) 44-48.
[6]. Nguyễn Duy Việt, Độ tin cậy và an toàn hệ thống điều khiển giao thông, Nhà xuất bản Giao thông vận tải, 2010.
[7]. R. Saddem, J. Beugin, M. Ghazel, Methodology Framework for Modelling ETCS - L3 Moving Block System, Conference: TRA 2022 - Transport Research Arena, At: Lisbon, 2022.
[8]. Trinh Thi Huong, Nguyen Manh Dat, To Thi Thao, Nguyen Duy Viet, Vu Van Yem, Compensating Doppler Frequency Shift of High Speed Rail Communications, International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 13 (2018) 13344-13348.
[9]. H. Lin, T. Yuan, W. Bai, Z. Zhao, L. Ran, X. Li, Q. Lin, Railway Signaling Safety Factors Quantitative Analysis Using an Improved 5M Model, Sustainability, 14 (2022) 6247. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106247
[10]. K. C. Hsueh, Y. C. Lai, Automatic Evaluation Framework for Reliability and Safety of Multiple Train Detection Systems, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2677 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981221130331
[11]. D. V. Efanov, V. V. Khoroshev, G. V. Osadchy, Principles of Safety Signalling and Traffic Control Systems Synthesis on Railways, 2023 International Conference on Industrial Engineering, Applications and Manufacturing (ICIEAM), Sochi, Russian Federation, (2023) 634-638. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIEAM57311.2023.10139292
[2]. EN50126-2; Railway Applications—Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety Specifications and Demonstrations (RAMS) Part 2: A systems approach to safety. Center for European Standards Management (CEN-CENELEC): Brussels, Belgium, 2017.
[3]. A. Boussif, A.Tonk, J. Beugin, S. C. Dutilleu, Operational risk assessment of railway remote driving system, Safety and Reliability, (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/09617353.2023.2226965
[4]. Nguyễn Duy Việt, Phân tích an toàn hệ thống đóng đường tự động đường đôi dòng một chiều trên cơ sở phân tích chức năng để xác định nguyên nhân dẫn tới trạng thái nguy hiểm, Tạp chí Khoa học và Công nghệ Giao thông Vận tải, 56 (2017) 52-58.
[5]. Nguyễn Duy Việt, Xây dựng phần tử logic “AND” an toàn với tín hiệu kiểm tra chuyên dụng sử dụng trong hệ thống điều khiển chạy tàu, Tạp chí Khoa học và Công nghệ Giao thông Vận tải, 64 (2018) 44-48.
[6]. Nguyễn Duy Việt, Độ tin cậy và an toàn hệ thống điều khiển giao thông, Nhà xuất bản Giao thông vận tải, 2010.
[7]. R. Saddem, J. Beugin, M. Ghazel, Methodology Framework for Modelling ETCS - L3 Moving Block System, Conference: TRA 2022 - Transport Research Arena, At: Lisbon, 2022.
[8]. Trinh Thi Huong, Nguyen Manh Dat, To Thi Thao, Nguyen Duy Viet, Vu Van Yem, Compensating Doppler Frequency Shift of High Speed Rail Communications, International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 13 (2018) 13344-13348.
[9]. H. Lin, T. Yuan, W. Bai, Z. Zhao, L. Ran, X. Li, Q. Lin, Railway Signaling Safety Factors Quantitative Analysis Using an Improved 5M Model, Sustainability, 14 (2022) 6247. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106247
[10]. K. C. Hsueh, Y. C. Lai, Automatic Evaluation Framework for Reliability and Safety of Multiple Train Detection Systems, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2677 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981221130331
[11]. D. V. Efanov, V. V. Khoroshev, G. V. Osadchy, Principles of Safety Signalling and Traffic Control Systems Synthesis on Railways, 2023 International Conference on Industrial Engineering, Applications and Manufacturing (ICIEAM), Sochi, Russian Federation, (2023) 634-638. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIEAM57311.2023.10139292
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Received
13/07/2023
Revised
19/08/2023
Accepted
22/08/2023
Published
15/10/2023
Type
Research Article
How to Cite
Nguyễn Duy, V., Trịnh Thị, H., Trịnh Văn, M., & Vũ Trọng, T. (1697302800). The determination of indicators for the safety assessment of modern train control signal system. Transport and Communications Science Journal, 74(8), 913-922. https://doi.org/10.47869/tcsj.74.8.5
Abstract Views
186
Total Galley Views
112
